Voidable Transactions

Often referred to as ”claw back provisions”, sections 588FA and 588FB of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) permit liquidators to recover certain transactions made by the insolvent company within a specified period prior to the commencement of the liquidation.

The provisions are designed to avoid unfair advantages to unsecured creditors over the pool of creditors. These transactions are known as “voidable transactions”, the most common of which are unfair preferences.

It is useful to understand the different categories of voidable transactions, the liquidator’s powers and the possibility of available defences.

When is a Transaction Voidable?

Section 9 of the Act defines transaction as (without limitation) including a payment by the company, an obligation incurred, a company loan, a charge created on company property, a waiver or release, transfer of property or a guarantee.

For a transaction to be voidable within the meaning of s 588FE of the Act, it must be an insolvent transaction and to have occurred within the 6 month period prior to the liquidation or bankruptcy.

Types of voidable transactions include unfair preferences, uncommercial transactions, unfair loans and unreasonable director-related transactions. To know what to look out for when considering the question of solvency, please see our insolvency checklist:

Section 588FA: Unfair Preferences

Unfair preferences are the most common types of transactions pursued by liquidators (s 588FA). In order to establish a preferential payment, the liquidator must establish that:

  • the transaction was between the company and a creditor
  • the company was insolvent at the time of the transaction
  • the transaction was entered into within the relation back period
  • the transaction resulted in the creditor receiving more than they would have, had the transaction been set aside and the creditor prove for the debt in the winding up (ie, they were preferred)

It is important to demonstrate that the creditor knew or should have suspected that the company was insolvent at the time the transaction was entered into.

The transaction must have occurred within the following dates prior to the relation back date (the commencement of the winding up):

  • 6 months for transactions with unrelated parties
  • 4 years for transactions with related entities
  • 10 years where the purpose of the transaction was to defeat, delay or interfere with the rights of creditors.

Section 588FB: Uncommercial Transactions

Where a Court considers that the company gained no benefit or advantage from the transaction or it caused detriment to the company that cannot be explained by normal commercial practices, the Court may declare that it was an uncommercial transaction (s 588FB).

In order for the court to void the transaction, the following criteria must apply:

  • the company was a party to transaction
  • it was an insolvent transaction
  • a reasonable person in the position of the company would not have entered into the transaction.

To be voidable, an uncommercial transaction must have occurred during the 2 years prior to the ?liquidation. ?If a related entity is a party to the transaction, however, the time period is 4 years and if the intention of the transaction is to defeat creditors, the time period is 10 years.

Professor Keay (Liquidators’ Avoidance of Uncommercial Transactions (1996) 70 ALJ 390 at 398) considers that transactions which may be challenged successfully include those where the company leases an asset over its rental value, forgives a debt, sells a business for less than market value, agrees to perform tasks for no consideration, makes gifts or provides security for a previously unsecured loan, to name a few.

Section 588FD: Unfair Loans

In circumstances where a lender provides a loan to the company which later goes into liquidation and the interest or charges on that loan are extortionate, the loan is voidable against a liquidator under s 588FD.

There are no timeframes imposed by the Act for recovery of unfair loans, and there are no statutory defences available to the lender in the event the loan is established to be an unfair loan.

Section 588FDA: Unreasonable Director-related Transactions

Pursuant to Section 588FDA of the Act, a transaction is an unreasonable director-related transaction of a company if:

  • The transaction is a payment, transfer of property, issue of securities or incurring of an obligation by the company;
  • Made to the director or close associate of the director; and
  • A reasonable person in the company’s circumstances would not have entered into the transaction having regard to the benefit or detriment to the company or other parties.

Examples of unreasonable director-related transactions commonly encountered in practice include reductions in related party loans, excessive or unreasonable remuneration / wages paid to directors.

The timeframe prescribed by the Act for such transactions is four (4) years from the commencement of the winding up.

Section 588FG: Defences

A range of defences exist under the legislation for parties to a transaction, including that:

  • they became a party to the transaction in good faith;
  • they had no reasonable grounds for suspecting the company was insolvent or ?would become insolvent, at the time they entered into the transaction;
  • a reasonable person in those circumstances would not so suspect; and
  • they provided valuable consideration for, or changed their position in reliance on, the transaction.

The onus of proving the defence rests with the person claiming the defence (Levi v Guerlini (1997) 24 ACSR 159; 15 ACLC 913) and an actual apprehension or mistrust will suffice to prove “suspicion” of insolvency (see Wily (as joint liquidators of Boutique Resorts Management Pty Ltd) v Commissioner of Taxation [2002] NSWSC 909.

Section 588FF: Court Powers to Set Aside Transactions

The Court can make orders about voidable transactions on application by the company’s liquidator (s 588FF), including the following:

  • an order that a person transfer property to the company,
  • an order that a person pay to the company (liquidator) the amount received by that person under the transaction,
  • discharge a debt incurred by the company in connection with the transaction, vary an agreement or declare it void or unenforceable
  • an order that a person pay an amount which equates to some benefit the person may have obtained as a result of the transaction.

For more information on corporate insolvency or specific insolvency services, contact the team at Rapsey Griffiths on (02) 4929 3019 for a confidential consultation.